Panels

Artificial Intelligence and the Administration of Justice

September 29, 2pm - 4pm

This panel aims to understand how the development of Artificial Intelligence within the Superior Courts, as well as subnational Courts of Justice (Brazil and Portugal) are related to the dimensions of the administration of Justice. In this context, the development of applications related to Artificial Intelligence has been taking place in several fields of public and private life. For Law, the question remains: what are the challenges of these applications, considering the multiple interactions of knowledge they require? In the theme of Justice Administration, the questions become more specific in an attempt to understand: what is the scope of applications developed by Justice in Artificial Intelligence themes? What are the main results obtained by these applications? What are the impacts on the administration of Justice? What ethical, moral and protection rights and guarantees issues have been developed from these experiences? Which lessons from international experience on the subject are possible to be replicated in the Brazilian context?

These are the questions that guide the panel composed of the following guests:

The reflections of this panel intend to lead to the construction of investigations in which the attention given to the development of experiences in this field are intercrossed with different interdisciplinary understandings, which can strengthen the services related to the provision of justice.

Panel Coordination and Mediation:

Agenda 2030 in the Judiciary

September 28, 2pm - 4pm

This panel aims to understand the challenges and changes needed in the administration of justice to achieve Goal 9: integrate Agenda 2030 with the Judiciary (approved by the STJ and the State Justice, Federal Justice, Labor Justice, Military Justice) of the Council National Justice System approved in 2020. The implementation of the new goal brings to the Judiciary the challenge of gauging the results of the Brazilian Justice, based on the structuring of Innovation Laboratories, Intelligence for Sustainable Development Goals (LIODS), for the creation of indicators. In the LIODS, the most judicialized topics are verified and, from that, the problems, the necessary methodology and the solution that the Judiciary Power must adopt are identified, therefore, this management model will directly impact the practices of the administration of justice. This panel will bring to the public debate questions such as: What is the importance of integrating the 2030 agenda with the Judiciary? What are the challenges of this goal? How does this goal impact the routine of judicial structures? What are the impacts on the administration of Justice? What are the main results already obtained? Which lessons from international experience on the subject are possible to be replicated in the Brazilian context?

These are the questions that guide the panel composed of the following guests:

Panel Coordination and Mediation:

Leadership and Justice Reform Process Management

September 29, 11am - 1pm

The objective of this panel is to deepen the theme associated with how leadership and its different styles can influence the management of reform processes in the justice sector. Leadership leads to change, and the justice sector is no exception to this rule, as leadership is about determining the direction of the organization through the establishment of a vision and a strategy. The vision of leaders in justice system organizations should be the description of something that is intended for the future: organization, culture, technology, activities, etc., in terms of the essence of what the organization should be in the medium or long term. If change and innovation are natural processes that result from the internal dynamics and external relations of organizations with their environment, administrative reform, however, is the artificial incentive to administrative transformation, in the continuous search for performance improvement, against resistance. Therefore, problems associated with the reform of justice arise: is it manipulated?; is it episodic?; is it preventable?; is it artificial?; does it necessarily imply resistance?; it appears only in times of crisis? A critical look at the forms of leadership of justice organizations undoubtedly helps to provide answers to these questions.

These are the questions that guide the panel composed of the following guests:

Panel Coordination and Mediation: